Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Five members belonging to the Non-Aligned Movement will sit on the Security Council in 2022
11 October 2021
Of the countries serving terms on the Security Council in 2022, five will be full members of the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM): Gabon, Ghana, India, Kenya and the United Arab Emirates, representing a drop of one from the 2021 Council . . .
Vetoes, insufficient votes and competing draft resolutions accentuate divisions within the Council
2 April 2022
Since 2000, and especially since 2010, there has been a marked increase in divisive votes in the Security Council,
which reflects the fact that some Council members are now less willing to shield the Council's divisions from
public view. In part, this reflects the polarizing nature of some key items more recently before the Council . . .
Last Update: 20 November 2024
UPDATE WEBSITE OF
THE PROCEDURE OF THE UN SECURITY COUNCIL, 4TH EDITION
by Loraine Sievers and Sam Daws, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2014
Updated on 30 January 2020
Chapter 2: PLACE AND FORMAT OF COUNCIL PROCEEDINGS
Section 7: Wrap-up meetings
2019 presidential note seeks to improve the conduct and scope of “Toledo-style” wrap-up meetings held at the end of Council presidencies
On 27 December 2019, after two years of negotiations in the Informal Working Group on Documentation and Other Procedural Questions (IWG), under the chairmanship of Kuwait, the Security Council adopted presidential note S/2019/994 on the subject of wrap-up briefings given to non-Council Member States at the end of Council presidencies.
S/2019/994 begins by recalling that in the comprehensive presidential note on working methods S/2017/507, the Council members had encouraged each month’s President “to hold an informal briefing session with the wider membership on the work of the Council at the end of its presidency, as appropriate”. While both S/2017/507 and S/2019/994 state that “A formal wrap-up session may also continue to be organized”, the focus of S/2019/994 is on informal briefings.[1]
Paragraph (b) of S/2019/994 encourages Council Presidents “to utilize the ‘Toledo-style’ format during such informal briefing sessions, whereby members of the Council present the activity of the Council for the month jointly and in an interactive manner”.
A related article on this website explains that Spain, at the close of its October 2015 Council presidency, introduced a new format for informal wrap-up meetings to be led by the outgoing President jointly with one or more other Council members, most often coming from different regions. These wrap-ups were called “Toledo-style” in honour of the Spanish city of Toledo, which is renowned for the cooperative relations there between Christian, Muslim and Jewish communities during the Middle Ages.
As explained by a representative of Spain, “Toledo-style” wrap-ups are more than “a mere recapitulation of the work of the Council over a given month”. Instead, a group of permanent representatives “respond to questions and comments from the membership about what has and has not been achieved during the month”.[2] A representative of the United Kingdom has noted that “Toledo-style” wrap-ups have the same benefit as formal wrap-up meetings in terms of transparency, “but they have the added benefit of allowing interactivity and allowing all General Assembly colleagues to ask us questions.”[3]
Nonetheless, after four years of experience with “Toledo-style” meetings, Council members came to feel that the conduct of these wrap-ups could be improved. To that end, paragraph (c) of S/2019/994 encourages Council Presidents “to forgo detailed summaries of the Council’s activities during the month in favour of a more analytical discussion with non-Council members and utilize more time to hear their feedback”.
In order to broaden the comprehensiveness of “Toledo-style” wrap-ups, paragraph (d) provides that Council Presidents “may invite the lead or co-leads of a Council visiting mission that was held during that month to actively contribute to the wrap-up session”.
So as to maximize attendance at these wrap-ups, paragraph (e) of S/2019/994 encourages Council Presidents
“to announce the date of the wrap-up session with sufficient time to allow for adequate preparation by all participants and request the inclusion of the wrap-up session in the Council’s monthly programme of work and the Journal of the United Nations.”
(This update supplements pages 52-56 of the book.)
__________________________
[1] The last formal wrap-up was convened by Ukraine in February 2017.
[2] S/PV.7740 of 19 July 2016.
[3] S/PV.7616 of 29 January 2016.